Joint Statement from Project Resist & FiLiA on Earned Settlement.

The Government is currently proposing to bring in a new immigration model for settlement – the 'earned settlement' scheme – which will make the granting of permanent residence dependent on financial contributions and high levels of integration and compliance rather than length of residence. If enacted, it will have a terrifying impact on the poorest and most vulnerable migrants, particularly women. It will create a hierarchical, two-tiered society made up of British citizens and non-citizens, with far-reaching consequences not just for migrants but for British society as a whole.

We need to resist this proposal before it is too late. As organisations working for women's rights and migrant justice, we have been shocked by the brutality of ICE, the US immigration and border patrol force, and its use of violence to terrorise migrants and the US citizens who support them. We should not think the UK is immune from such state-orchestrated cruelty. The enactment of 'hostile environment' immigration policies by successive governments has, over the years, created fear and uncertainty for many migrants. It has led to unprecedented levels of immigration raids and enabled widespread public displays of anti-immigration racism and violence. The political direction of travel could not be clearer. This is the time to join together in resistance.

The proposed model is widely acknowledged to represent the most significant shake-up of the immigration system since the Immigration Act 1971. It will put settlement out of reach for most new migrants and also most of those who have built their lives here. Only high earners or those on priority routes will have access to an accelerated (three- to five-year) route to settlement. The majority will have to wait for up to ten or 15 years, or even more, before gaining residence rights, which is up from the current five years. This includes children and those who work in transport, the care sector and other frontline public services. Small discounts to the residence timeline may be applied if migrants can show higher levels of 'integration', A-level fluency in English and 'good character and conduct'. Those who are ill or disabled or have dependent partners or children or who have relied on public funds, or those who have arrived in the UK illegally, entered on a visitor visa or overstayed their visas, may have to wait for up to 20 years. Even those who are fleeing persecution are likely to have to wait 20 years or more for settlement rights. This will make the UK's asylum laws some of the toughest in Europe.

The rationale used to justify the settlement proposals is ostensibly to facilitate 'integration'. But there is growing consensus that they will cause immense poverty, hardship and division, and make integration even more difficult to achieve for many migrants.

The proposals are not only profoundly racist and classist, but also sexist. We are deeply concerned about the impact of the proposals on vulnerable migrants, including women, and we urge the Government to share the Equality Impact Assessment they say they have carried out in relation to this proposal. Women will be disproportionately affected. They are more likely to be dependants of male earners, to work part-time or in informal or low-paid sectors, to have childcare and other domestic responsibilities and to rely on welfare benefits. The disadvantages and barriers to integration they already face will be exacerbated by their effective exclusion from early routes to settlement.

Women who have experienced domestic abuse, coercive control, trafficking and exploitation have often overstayed their visas or entered the UK illegally – through no fault of their own. Most depend on the welfare safety net to exit abuse and overcome trauma, but under the proposals they will be penalised and made to face long qualifying periods. In addition, those who try to defend themselves against violence or have been criminalised as a result of counter-allegations made by abusers – who increasingly use such tactics as part of their coercive control – will also be denied early settlement. Immigration rules such as the 'no recourse to public funds' (NRPF) condition already force many women into economic dependency, placing them at serious risk of abuse and harm for long periods. Under the new proposals, their economic dependency on abusive and exploitative men will be further heightened and they will remain trapped in destitution and precarious situations for even longer.

Far from encouraging integration, the proposals are likely to add to a growing migrant underclass subject to punitive state responses, anti-immigration racism, sexism, exploitation and degradation. If enacted, they will contravene the Government's legal and moral obligations to provide humanitarian care and human rights protection. Our concern is that the Government knows this but is deliberately choosing to be driven by anti-immigration politics.

We deplore this latest unconscionable move to placate the far right. We call on the Government to reconsider the earned settlement model in its entirety. It will cause untold distress and hardship within migrant families as members, including children, are forced along different and arbitrary paths to settlement and citizenship. It will also create divisions between British citizens and migrants and further institutionalise hatred, intolerance and exclusion. The Government contends that settlement is a privilege, not a right, however we assert that settlement and citizenship rights should no longer be rooted in the country's colonial legacy, but must be forged in the values of democracy and our shared humanity.

• Anita Gera, Co-founder, Hague Explained CIC
• Brighton Women's Liberation Collective, Organisers of Sisters' Salon
• Centre for Women's Justice
• Cristina Odone, Chief Executive Officer, Fair Hearing
• Cris McCurley, Legal Consultant, Head of International Family Law, Ben Hoare Bell Solicitors
• Dania Thomas, Director of Ubuntu Women Shelter
• Dr Sara Reis, Deputy Director and Head of Research and Policy, Women's Budget Group
• Erin Leonard Parker, Director of Policy and Advocacy, Represent Women
• Faty Kane, Executive Director, The Angelou Centre
• Feminist Dissent
• Firoza Mohmed, Chief Executive Officer, Humraaz
• Halaleh Taheri, Executive Director & Founder of MEWSo
• Jasmine Mohammed, Director of Safety4Sisters
• Jennifer Nadel, CEO Compassion in Politics
• Jo Gough, Rise CEO
• Hari Reed, Joint CEO, Asylum Welcome
• Kate Agha, Sundial Centre for Education on Harmful Practices (previously Oxford Against Cutting, OAC)
• Karma Nirvana
• Labour Women's Declaration Working Group
• Laura Seebohm, Feminist Leader in the Women's Sector
• Lesbian Immigration Support Group (LISG)
• Dr Manal Ahmed, Managing Director, We Are the Tree CIC
• Maryam Namazie, Spokesperson of One Law for All
• Mollin Delve, Chief Executive Officer, Phoebe Centre
• NaariSamatā
• One Million Women and Girls (1MW&G)
• Onjali Rauf, Founder and CEO of Making Herstory (MH) & O's Refugee Aid Team (ORAT)
• Rights of Women
• Sarbit Ganger, Director AWRC
• Social Scientists Against the Hostile Environment
• Sonia Jalal, CEO, Hull Sisters
• Surwat Sohail, Chief Executive Officer, Roshni Birmingham
• The Halo Project
• Vicky Marsh, Assistant Director of Safety4Sisters
• WWIN: Specialist Domestic Abuse Service

• Amrita Shodhan, SOAS, University of London
• Alice Bondi
• Cathy Devine, Freelance Academic
• Charlie Weinberg, Feminist Activist and Co-Founder of Women's Liberation Alliance
• Debbie Waldon
• Professor Eleonore Kofman, Middlesex University London
• Esua Goldsmith, Feminist Writer, Facilitator, Strategist
• Fiona Sheil, Researcher
• Francesca Platt, Community Worker/Filmmaker
• Georgie Wemyss, University of East London
• Gita Sahgal, Feminist, Writer and Human Rights Campaigner
• Jane Ayres
• Jane Clare Jones, Feminist Philosopher, Writer and Activist
• Judith Green, women's rights activist
• Karen Smith
• Kiri Tunks, Trade Union and Women's Rights Activist
• Laura Seebohm, Feminist Leader in the Women's Sector
• Liane Timmermann, lesbian feminist activist
• Professor Liz Kelly, London Metropolitan University
• Professor Mary Davis, Visiting Professor Royal Holloway University London & Co-Founder of Women's Liberation Alliance
• Monika Neall
• Natasha Walter, Author and Campaigner
• Nira Yuval-Davies, Emeritus Professor and Honorary Director of the Centre of Migration, Refugees and Belonging
• Dr Rachel Hewitt, author
• Professor Rashmi Varma, Warwick University
• Rebecca Durand, ESOL Teacher
• Roseanne Rabinowitz, Author and Activist
• Sarah Johnson, Trade Union Activist
• Sally Young, Feminist Activist
• Stephanie Cole, feminist
• Stephen Cowden, Senior Lecturer in Social Work, University of Gloucester
• Suzette Cullen
• Yasmin Rehman, Feminist and Human Rights Activist