The Government is currently proposing to bring in a new immigration model for settlement – the ‘earned settlement’ scheme – which will make the granting of permanent residence dependent on financial contributions and high levels of integration and compliance rather than length of residence. If enacted, it will have a terrifying impact on the poorest and most vulnerable migrants, particularly women. It will create a hierarchical, two-tiered society made up of British citizens and non-citizens, with far-reaching consequences not just for migrants but for British society as a whole.

We need to resist this proposal before it is too late. As organisations working for women’s rights and migrant justice, we have been shocked by the brutality of ICE, the US immigration and border patrol force, and its use of violence to terrorise migrants and the US citizens who support them. We should not think the UK is immune from such state-orchestrated cruelty. The enactment of ‘hostile environment’ immigration policies by successive governments has, over the years, created fear and uncertainty for many migrants. It has led to unprecedented levels of immigration raids and enabled widespread public displays of anti-immigration racism and violence. The political direction of travel could not be clearer. This is the time to join together in resistance.

‘Earned settlement’

The proposed model is widely acknowledged to represent the most significant shake-up of the immigration system since the Immigration Act 1971. It will put settlement out of reach for most new migrants and also most of those who have built their lives here. Only high earners or those on priority routes will have access to an accelerated (three- to five-year) route to settlement. The majority will have to wait for up to ten or 15 years, or even more, before gaining residence rights, which is up from the current five years. This includes children and those who work in transport, the care sector and other frontline public services. Small discounts to the residence timeline may be applied if migrants can show higher levels of ‘integration’, A-level fluency in English and ‘good character and conduct’. Those who are ill or disabled or have dependent partners or children or who have relied on public funds, or those who have arrived in the UK illegally, entered on a visitor visa or overstayed their visas, may have to wait for up to 20 years. Even those who are fleeing persecution are likely to have to wait 20 years or more for settlement rights. This will make the UK’s asylum laws some of the toughest in Europe. 

The rationale used to justify the settlement proposals is ostensibly to facilitate ‘integration’. But there is growing consensus that they will cause immense poverty, hardship and division, and make integration even more difficult to achieve for many migrants.

Impact on women

The proposals are not only profoundly racist and classist, but also sexist. We are deeply concerned about the impact of the proposals on vulnerable migrants, including women, and we urge the Government to share the Equality Impact Assessment they say they have carried out in relation to this proposal. Women will be disproportionately affected. They are more likely to be dependants of male earners, to work part-time or in informal or low-paid sectors, to have childcare and other domestic responsibilities and to rely on welfare benefits. The disadvantages and barriers to integration they already face will be exacerbated by their effective exclusion from early routes to settlement.

Women who have experienced domestic abuse, coercive control, trafficking and exploitation have often overstayed their visas or entered the UK illegally – through no fault of their own. Most depend on the welfare safety net to exit abuse and overcome trauma, but under the proposals they will be penalised and made to face long qualifying periods. In addition, those who try to defend themselves against violence or have been criminalised as a result of counter-allegations made by abusers – who increasingly use such tactics as part of their coercive control – will also be denied early settlement. Immigration rules such as the ‘no recourse to public funds’ (NRPF) condition already force many women into economic dependency, placing them at serious risk of abuse and harm for long periods. Under the new proposals, their economic dependency on abusive and exploitative men will be further heightened and they will remain trapped in destitution and precarious situations for even longer.  

Settlement is a right, not a privilege

Far from encouraging integration, the proposals are likely to add to a growing migrant underclass subject to punitive state responses, anti-immigration racism, sexism, exploitation and degradation. If enacted, they will contravene the Government’s legal and moral obligations to provide humanitarian care and human rights protection. Our concern is that the Government knows this but is deliberately choosing to be driven by anti-immigration politics.

We deplore this latest unconscionable move to placate the far right. We call on the Government to reconsider the earned settlement model in its entirety. It will cause untold distress and hardship within migrant families as members, including children, are forced along different and arbitrary paths to settlement and citizenship. It will also create divisions between British citizens and migrants and further institutionalise hatred, intolerance and exclusion. The Government contends that settlement is a privilege, not a right, however we assert that settlement and citizenship rights should no longer be rooted in the country’s colonial legacy, but must be forged in the values of democracy and our shared humanity.

Our voices are more powerful together. If you would like to sign this statement in solidarity, please email: comms@projectresist.com

This statement is signed and endorsed by:

For more information also see FiLiA’s website

Amrita Shodhan, SOAS, University of London

Cristina Odone, Chief Executive Officer, Fair Hearing

Dania Thomas, Director of Ubuntu Women Shelter

Faty Kane, Executive Director, The Angelou Centre

Feminist Dissent

Fiona Sheil, Researcher

Firoza Mohmed, Chief Executive Officer, Humraaz

Halaleh Taheri, Executive Director & Founder of MEWSo 

Jane Clare Jones, Feminist Philosopher, Writer and Activist

Jasmine Mohammed, Director of Safety4Sisters

Karma Nirvana

Lesbian Immigration Group

Mollin Delve, Chief Executive Officer, Pheobe Centre

NaariSamatã

Natasha Walter, Author and Campaigner

Professor Rashmi Varma, Warwick University

Rebecca Durand, ESOL Teacher

Roseanne Rabinowitz, Author and Activist

Sally Young, Feminist Activist

Sarbit Ganger, Director AWRC

Stephen Cowden, Senior Lecturer in Social Work, University of Gloucester

Surwat Sohail, Chief Executive Officer, Roshni Birmingham.

The Halo Project

WWIN: Specialist Domestic Abuse Service

Yasmin Rehman, Feminist and Human Rights Activist